Monday, February 6, 2012

Spiritual Warfare

"The primary manifestation of satanic influence and of the evil of This Age is religious; it is blindness with reference to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. How often we fail to understand satanic devices! A man may be a cultured, ethical and even religious person and yet be in demonic darkness. Satan's basic desire is to keep men from Christ. His primary concern is not to corrupt morals nor to make atheists nor to produce enemies of religion. Indeed religion which rests upon the assumption of human adequacy and sufficiency is an enemy of the light. This is the character of the Age of this world: darkness."

- George Eldon Ladd

Ladd is right; "how often we fail to understand satanic devices."

I am a little bit disappointed by the way spiritual warfare has been emphasized on campus. I am not disappointed because i think the topic has been overemphasized, as if we need to balance out the spiritual side of things (demons, Holy Spirit, Satan, prayer, speaking in tongues, prophecy, healing, etc) with the practical side of things (academics, thinking, career, family, etc). I am disappointed precisely because the work of the Holy Spirit has been belittled; his work has been - in my judgment (and in others') - somewhat restricted to the realm of paranormal activity.

I am aware that the work of Satan manifests itself in such activity, in the physically inexplainable, and that the Holy Spirit provides redemption through healing, exorcism, and other miraculous events. I am thankful for my brothers and sisters who labor in holy warfare against this manifestation of the work of Satan. But I am frustrated when terms like "the work of Satan" and "spiritual warfare" and "the Holy Spirit" are used in reference to paranormal activity alone.

Here is why.

1) The Father and the Son

God, the loving Father, is revealed in the Beloved Son. The eternal existence of Jesus Christ as the Beloved Son proves that God is who he is most essentially, namely, a loving Father. If Jesus Christ the Beloved Son at any point did not exist as a fundamental part of who God is, then God would cease to be a loving Father. Therefore, God the loving Father is revealed in his Son, the Beloved Son Jesus Christ.

"No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father's side, he has made him known" (John 1:18)

2) The Holy Spirit

Jesus says, "He [the Holy Spirit] will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you" (John 16:14).

The Spirit's sword is the Word, and Jesus is the Word (Ephesians 6:17). If one is hesitant to understand this sword to be Jesus, then simply understand that the Bible is the witness to Jesus (John 5:39), and this witness is the Spirit's sword. Either way, the sword of the Spirit is the proclamation of Jesus.

The work of the Spirit is witnessing and proclaiming Jesus, who reveals the heart of the loving Father. Whether the Church's work is fighting sex-trafficking, praying, preaching, exegesis, social justice, etc., the ultimate goal is the proclamation of Jesus by the power of the Spirit. And the revelation of the Beloved Son reveals the loving Father.

3) Satan and Demons

The work of Satan and his demons in false-prophecy, witchcraft, antichrists, sorcery, corrupt doctrine, insecurity, pornography, sex-trafficking, drug-abuse, or any of these things is ultimately the work to hide the truth of the heart of the Father, to hide the revelation of Jesus Christ the Son, and to extinguish the flame of the Holy Spirit.

Jesus is the Word of God the Father, and Satan's work is rooted in the sentence "did God really say?" Demonic oppression is simply an extension of that work; he is still trying to cause human beings to not believe the Word who is Jesus.

4) Sin

Therefore, sin is most fundamentally not believing the Word. Humanity has rejected the Word, the Beloved Son, and as a result blasphemed the character of God the Father.

In the Pentateuch God is revealed as the Father of humanity (Gen 5:1-3), and the disobedience of Israel is summed up in Moses statement to them in Deuteronomy 32:6

"Do you thus repay the LORD,
you foolish and senseless people?
Is not he your Father, who created you,
who made you and established you?"

Malachi puts it the same:

"Have we not all one Father? Has not one God created us? Why then are we faithless to one another, profaning the covenant of our fathers?" (Malachi 2:10)

No matter how sin has manifested itself in a person's life, the most fundamental problem is that this person does not truly believe that God is a Father who loves them. This is the truth revealed in Jesus Christ. And if any person fully believed this truth they would be free from sin, from Satan and demons.

5) Demonic oppression

Furthermore - as Ladd has explained - a man who is a good husband and a good father, who works hard, and who is absolutely convinced that he does not need the Truth of Jesus Christ, is in demonic darkness, and is as much in need of the freedom of the Holy Spirit as a "demon possessed" man.

It is easy to recognize demonic activity when a person is cursing the name of Jesus. But do we not symbolically curse the name of Jesus when we indulge in prideful thoughts throughout our day, as if these were a happy alternative to the joy of being assured of the love of the Father? I am arguing that this is demonic activity.

And so the work of the Holy Spirit which relates to every moment of every human being's life has been belittled because "demonic activity" and "spiritual warfare" have been emphasized as relating to paranormal activity alone.

I believe that Satan is happy when the Church focuses on his work as only relating to paranormal activity and physical, tangible manifestations of demons. He is happy because we neglect the fact that his work is permeating the lives of soccer moms, hipster baristas, rockstars, as well as witches. When a man is "possessed by a demon" it is obvious, and the Church will pray. But when a man thinks he does not need Jesus because he has a good job, it is a more subtle and dangerous work of Satan.

I am not concerned with balancing Spirit and Truth, that is, balancing crazy spirituality with solid doctrine. I am concerned to redefine the work of the Spirit as ultimately proclaiming Jesus, who reveals the heart of the Father. I want to be consumed with this Spirit. I long for his freedom, for his proclamation of the victory of Jesus over Satan and demons. I am quite convinced that the way "spiritual warfare" has been emphasized has missed this. I am not alone in this sentiment.

At the end of the day, I am just another voice at the table, and my opinion is my opinion. This post is an effort to do theology and think of truth in community. I am thankful that God's Spirit is indeed moving and shaping our community. The past school-year has made it obvious that he does indeed want us to have a more clear definition of "spiritual warfare".

Sunday, January 29, 2012

Leave Your Water Jar and Be Satisfied in Jesus

Here is the script for a sermon I gave at Skamania January 8th, 2012.



I. Introduction

A reoccurring theme in the Gospel of John is that the eternal Son of God has taken on human flesh and confronted the idolatry of humanity. The author, the apostle John, is always working this theme out through stories of Jesus confronting the different characters, who are tripped up on physical, tangible, earthly things, and fail to see any spiritual significance in them. Idolatry is when humanity "worships and serves the creature rather than the Creator" as the apostle Paul puts it.

This is a major theme in all of John's writings. 1 John continues this theme of Jesus, who is God, confronting idolatry in his humanity. The epistle opens with this theme: “That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we looked upon, and have touched with our hands, concerning the word of life - the life was made manifest, and we have seen it, and testify to it and proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and was made manifest to us” (1 John 1:1-2); John's testimony is of the tangible, physical, real humanity of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. John’s epistle ends - by no coincidence - with the command, “little children, keep yourselves from idols” (1 John 5:21).

It is important, then, to have a more biblical understanding of what idolatry is.

Genesis teaches that God made this entire physical universe for the good of humanity, to bless humanity, but humanity - as sons and daughters of God - instead of receiving the Father's blessing of creation in thankfulness, has worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator; we have committed idolatry; we have forgotten the Creator and turned to created, earthly things for our joy. But God is always working in creation to win our attention and affection. He is Immanuel, God with us, and he moves through physical, tangible, human events to win our affection and capture our hearts. This is what the incarnation is. This is what Christmas is all about.

Athanasius, a church father, puts it best. He says, “Men had turned from the contemplation of God above, and were looking for Him in the opposite direction, down among created things and things of sense. The Savior of us all, the Word of God, in His great love took to Himself a body and moved as Man among men, meeting their senses, so to speak, half way. He became Himself an object for the senses, so that those who were seeking God in sensible things might apprehend the Father through the works which He, the Word of God, did in the body”
...
“For this reason was He both born and manifested as Man, for this He died and rose, in order that, eclipsing by His works all other human deeds, He might recall men from all the paths of error to know the Father” (Athanasius 26).

He is saying that we have taken our eyes off of God, the Creator, and turned them to created things. Our ultimate source of joy is no longer God himself as the giver of creation, but creation itself, and so God himself became a created thing. Jesus has been lifted up on the cross to draw all men to see himself, Creator among the creature.

In our text today we will see how this theme relates to worship. Church worship services involve physical orders of service. We are a physical, human community, there is no escaping the fact that worshiping God will involve real human actions and movements. There is indeed a right way to live out God's commandments in our real physical lives and actions, but we must pursue living out our lives in spirit and truth, in authentic worship of Christ, the Son of God.

When Jesus confronts idolatry, he does not tell the characters to turn a blind eye to created things as if the creation is bad, rather, he shows them how the creation proclaims the glory of the Son of God and must be received with thanksgiving. When we worship God we must pursue the right action with a heart of worship and thankfulness.

II. Text

“1Now when Jesus learned that the Pharisees had heard that Jesus was making and baptizing more disciples than John 2(although Jesus himself did not baptize, but only his disciples), 3he left Judea and departed again for Galilee. 4And he had to pass through Samaria. 5So he came to a town of Samaria called Sychar, near the field that Jacob had given to his son Joseph.

These verses are placed carefully at the beginning of this narrative to contrast the faith of the Samaritan woman and the hardheartedness of the Pharisees. We will see towards the end of the narrative that John will likewise contrast the disciples with the Samaritan woman.The Pharisees were unable to take their eyes off of earthly rituals and see Christ's Deity. Jesus therefore knew that there would be problems of jealousy and rivalry in Judea, so he leaves. One commentator points out that “John’s word for ‘left’ is unusual in the sense of leaving a place. It often has the meaning “abandon” (as in v. 28 of the woman’s waterpot), and there may be something of this meaning here.”

Jesus is abandoning the Pharisees and their hard-heartedness because they will not abandon their earthly institutional hangups and follow Jesus. This is precisely what John seeks to contrast later with the faith of the Samaritan woman; she will likewise be tripped up about the earthly well of Jacob. In John 2 we see that baptism is only significant in what it signifies, in the reality of spiritual baptism and new birth. Likewise, Jacob’s well is only significant in the Truth of Christ, the living water, as Jesus will explain to the woman. Both baptism and Jacob’s well point to Christ.

"6Jacob's well was there; so Jesus, wearied as he was from his journey, was sitting beside the well. It was about the sixth hour.”7 A woman from Samaria came to draw water. Jesus said to her, “Give me a drink.” 8 (For his disciples had gone away into the city to buy food.)

Jesus is wearied by his journey. This is not an arbitrary detail. John is showing us the humanity of Jesus; the Word has become flesh and dwelt among us and met us in our worldliness to redeem us. This is the man Jesus who the woman at well is now coming face to face with. Jesus is really a man; he is really thirsty. And as verse 11 will inform us, he is actually unable to get a drink for himself. His human weariness and limitedness is what has brought the woman into a conversation with the Word of God.

9 The Samaritan woman said to him, “How is it that you, a Jew, ask for a drink from me, a woman of Samaria?” (For Jews have no dealings with Samaritans.)

This woman's identity is found in that she is a Samaritan woman, rather than a Jewish man; Jesus has broken down these barriers in his humanity. We are constrained by our Earthly identities, by our personalities, by our race, by our gender, by our denominations, by our physical location on this planet. These are all things that develop our identity. Christ alone, in his humanity, is able to step across these boundaries and bring us to himself, to free us from these boundaries that constrain us and bring us into his identity as the Son of God.

What is the most true thing that someone can say about you? Is it that you are an American? Is it that you are middle-class? Is that you are a republican or a democrat? Is the most true thing about you the fact that you are a good or a bad family member? Is it that you have an outgoing or introverted personality? The most true and sure thing to say about you is the fact that Jesus loves you. Are you living your life like this?

10 Jesus answered her, “If you knew the gift of God, and who it is that is saying to you, ‘Give me a drink,’ you would have asked him, and he would have given you living water.” 11 The woman said to him, “Sir, you have nothing to draw water with, and the well is deep. Where do you get that living water? 12 Are you greater than our father Jacob? He gave us the well and drank from it himself, as did his sons and his livestock.” 13 Jesus said to her, “Everyone who drinks of this water will be thirsty again, 14 but whoever drinks of the water that I will give him will never be thirsty again. The water that I will give him will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life.” 15 The woman said to him, “Sir, give me this water, so that I will not be thirsty or have to come here to draw water.”

Here Jesus presents himself as the greater reality to the earthly thing in the woman's life, namely, the well and the water. This water was, for the Samaritan woman, significant because it was water from Jacob's well. She asks Jesus, "Are you greater than our father Jacob?" Jesus' answer is that the water that he gives will provide everlasting satisfaction. Yes, Jesus is greater than her father Jacob. Jacob's well is significant because it points to Jesus. Water is good, and it satisfies our thirst, because it testifies to the greater reality of Christ.

This is true about every earthly thing. In fact, this is Jesus' primary method of teaching the characters who he is. John the baptist, in chapter 2, spoke of the greater spiritual significance of baptism, and earthly institution. In chapter 3 Jesus told Nicodemus about spiritual birth, new birth, being born again, which is the significance of earthly birth. This is key. There is truly a reason for the way things are in this universe and for the events that occur. There is a reason we get thirsty, there is a reason human beings are born into this world, there is a reason that the sun rises and sets every day; God has control of this universe and has designed everything precisely and meaningful.

Jesus did not turn a blind eye to these earthly things, as the Gnostic Ascetics did, but rather Jesus showed how these earthly things taught about him. God has designed our bodies so that they become thirsty and need water to teach us how much we need him to satisfy our souls. This is what Jesus is teaching here in this passage.

Psalm 19 says,

1 The heavens declare the glory of God,
and the sky above proclaims his handiwork.
2 Day to day pours out speech,
and night to night reveals knowledge.
3 There is no speech, nor are there words,
whose voice is not heard.
4 Their voice goes out through all the earth,
and their words to the end of the world.

Creation does not glorify God just because it is beautiful. An agnostic hippie from Portland will tell you that creation is beautiful. But there is, for the Christian, something extremely profound about the beauty of the rising sun; it is because the faithfulness of God is like the rising of the sun. Likewise, water does not just happen to satisfy; it tastes good and satisfies because it proclaims who Christ is every time we are sustained and satisfied by it. "Their voice goes out through all the earth, and their words to the end of the world." Creation is beautiful because Christ is beautiful.

15 The woman said to him, “Sir, give me this water, so that I will not be thirsty or have to come here to draw water.”
16 Jesus said to her, “Go, call your husband, and come here.” 17 The woman answered him, “I have no husband.” Jesus said to her, “You are right in saying, ‘I have no husband’; 18 for you have had five husbands, and the one you now have is not your husband. What you have said is true.”

In verse 15, the woman seems to be jeering in her unbelief. Jesus then proceeds to cut through to her heart. She is a broken woman. She needs to be satisfied by Jesus. Here's what Calvin says about this passage: "those who are quite careless, almost deadened, have to be wounded with a sense of sin... we are not seriously affected by Christ's speaking unless we have been aroused to repentance. To profit aright in His school, a man's hardness must be subdued or ploughed by the sight of his own wretchedness" (Calvin 94). This is what is happening in this passage. We dismiss Jesus so quickly in our self-righteousness. We treat Jesus, the Bible, church, like a category of our life that we can take or leave; sure, you can be a religious person, you can follow Christ if that's your thing. But when Christ cuts to the heart of our sin we will know that he is the only remedy. He is not merely an alternative to an assortment of remedies for our problems in this life, his living water is the only water that will satisfy us.

19 The woman said to him, “Sir, I perceive that you are a prophet. 20 Our fathers worshiped on this mountain, but you say that in Jerusalem is the place where people ought to worship.” 21 Jesus said to her, “Woman, believe me, the hour is coming when neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem will you worship the Father. 22 You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews. 23 But the hour is coming, and is now here, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for the Father is seeking such people to worship him. 24 God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.” 25 The woman said to him, “I know that Messiah is coming (he who is called Christ). When he comes, he will tell us all things.” 26 Jesus said to her, “I who speak to you am he.”

Either the woman is trying to avoid the subject of her sin, or she has been at this point impressed by Jesus and sincerely wants to know how to worship truly. Either way, she steers the conversation towards the subject of worship, back to earthly places and things. Do true worshipers worship in Jerusalem or the mountain? Here, Jesus sharply contrasts the Jews and the Samaritans, and sides with the Jews, because the Samaritans "worship what they do not know". Why is it that Jesus sides with the Jews here? Isn't his whole point in this narrative to break down the barrier between Jew and Gentile?

Jesus sides with the Jews for a very specific reason; he says, "for salvation is from the Jews". Israel was the Messianic community. Their rituals and their regulations were setup to proclaim the coming Messiah. The hour had come for a transition out of these regulations because Christ had come.

There is a rightness of worship; inasmuch as our worship services are oriented towards the proclamation of the salvation of Christ, they are well-done. We often forget this in American evangelical churches because we have over-emphasized the heart, as if the heart is not affected by real tangible action and obedience.

But I want to suggest that there are two extremes: one extreme is to go through the motions with no heart as the Pharisees did, the other extreme is to be under the illusion that one can live life without going through motions, and that these motions are of no consequence. We are physical beings, and we have physical, earthly communities with physical, earthly worship services and fellowship times. God is gracious to his community by giving us regulations and guidelines to be followed for our worship services; we take communion to proclaim Christ's finished work, we baptize to proclaim Christ's finished work, we preach the Scriptures to proclaim Christ's finished work, and we sing songs to proclaim Christ's finished work. Jesus has sided with the Jews; they were proclaiming the coming Messiah, even if they had grown hardhearted in these very regulations.

This section concludes with Jesus being revealed as the Christ, the coming Messiah. This is what it's all about. All the controversy of regulations and method of worship is about the fact that Jesus is the Messiah, that he is the Christ, the Savior of the world. This is true worship; to embrace Jesus for who he is; he is the God who loves us.

27 Just then his disciples came back. They marveled that he was talking with a woman, but no one said, “What do you seek?” or, “Why are you talking with her?” 28 So the woman left her water jar and went away into town and said to the people, 29 “Come, see a man who told me all that I ever did. Can this be the Christ?” 30 They went out of the town and were coming to him.

After much clarity had been reached in the conversation between Jesus and the woman, the disciples return. I will leave most of their part in this story for next week, but already the reader can see the contrast between the disciples and this woman who met Jesus.

The woman abandons her water jar and goes into town to tell the people that she has found the Christ.

III. Application

Let Jesus confront the idolatry in your life.

How have you forgotten about Jesus in your daily routine, in the things that are important to you? Have you been lost in going through the motions of your life and forgotten how Christ is revealed in these motions? Is your work just work? Is your morning shower, brushing your teeth, eating breakfast, of absolutely no spiritual significance? It is not an accident that these things are in your life. God has control of this universe and he works all things to glorify his Son in our lives. He thought through whether or not it would be a good idea to create a world in which we would have to work, and that you would have the job that you have, and the family you have. These are not meaningless, random facts about life; they exist because God is our Father who loves us and is always working to sanctify his church.

Leave your water jar and be satisfied in Jesus. The woman at the Well would drink real, physical water again in her life, I'm guessing. But I think it would be difficult for her to not remember how satisfying to her soul Jesus is every time she took a drink. He has healed her brokenness, that is what he does, and that is why God designed a world in which we need water to be satisfied, so that we would know what Christ is like. Don't forget that about Christ. This is his world, this is his Creation, there is nothing neutral, nothing that exists outside of the truth that Jesus is a gracious and beautiful God, even waking up in the morning to go to work.

Think through those things in your life that are taking the place of Christ. What are things that you are convinced will make you happy? What are those things that you are convinced will satisfy you? Give those things up to Jesus. Leave your water jar and be satisfied in Jesus. Those things in your life are only good because they are a reflection of who Christ is; this is anything that you find enjoyable or satisfying in life. If these things are ends in themselves they are idols. Throw away your idols and worship Jesus. He is the only real God. Repent of idolatry and pursue satisfaction in Jesus.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Theology of the Turning Seasons

Each season has the potential to be either a joy or an inconvenience.

Snow, for instance, is beautiful. Kids are especially excited to see the snow falling, and are disappointed when it doesn't stick. Snow brings joy to families all over the world. Snow reminds us of Christmas. For many people snow is a nostalgic joy. Yet at the same time snow obstructs our labor. When the winter approaches, my hard-working brother always comments, "How can anyone like snow? It ruins everything!" And he's right. Snow is, in reality, a cause for car wrecks and a roadblock to good, hard-working citizens.

Then springtime comes. The melting ice is an apt picture of redemption. The sun rises and declares the faithfulness of God. But at the same time the sun brings a parched land, and rain is an image of the providence of God. His grace is like rain. "He turns the desert into pools of water, a parched land into springs of water" (Psalm 107:35).

But Portlanders are quite aware of the misery of rain. Rain is simultaneously an image of the providence of God and an image of misery. Everyone knows the cliché line, "At least it can't get any worse..." which is followed by thunder and rain.

Each season has the potential to be a joy and an inconvenience.

How quickly snow changes from a picture of the grace that covers our sins to a mess of inconvenient ice and slush.

There is something interestingly parallel between the search for the coming seed in the Hebrew Bible and the turning of the seasons. Take Noah, for instance. The reader is refreshed to arrive at Lamech, who lives 777 years, whose son Noah will "bring us relief out of the ground that Yahweh has cursed"(Genesis 5:29). But, like any given season, the story ends disappointingly with a mess of ice and slush, a drought, a miserable drizzle of rain, i.e. Noah gets drunk. He was not the coming seed after all.

Yet the story quickly comes to Abram, a new season. And the Hebrew Bible continues this search, this turn of seasons, as prophet after prophet, judge after judge, king after king are each a hopeful light of salvation, but each story ends disappointingly like Noah.

But the beauty of stories like Noah and seasons like spring is that they are a proclamation of the redemption of Messiah; they are by no means the Messiah themselves. And there is a bittersweetness in the life of Noah and the end of a good season; the bitterness is that they are not God, they are not Christ, but it is precisely this bitterness that provides the sweetness. They have done their work, they have proclaimed Christ, and have assured us that they themselves are not salvation, just as John the Baptist was obliged to say, "Behold the lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world" when the people thought that he might be the Messiah.

Not only is the Old Testament entirely Messianic, in fact, the entire universe is Messianic. The four seasons are prime examples, main stage performers in the drama of this universe, which proclaims the salvation of Christ. But they are not exceptions. "All things were created through him and for him" (Colossians 1:16).

"All things" does indeed include everything.

Enjoy the snow that reminds us that he has covered our sins, enjoy good food that reminds of the sustaining grace of his Word, and enjoy honey that reminds us of the sweetness of Jesus. These are not God; Jesus is.

Monday, December 5, 2011

Circles of Sanctification

The Church can never hold on to its humility or sincerity. It is not ours. It is the righteousness of Jesus. In the moment that the Church realizes its own humility it is condemned. But in its condemnation it is faced with its end, with its death in baptism with Christ, and thus given the prospect of resurrection with Christ, whose resurrection is the firstfruits. These patterns of humility and false-humility are the cycles or circles of sanctification that make up the very fabric and reality of the history of the Church. These circles of salvation are the weaving and working of the Holy Spirit, and must be received with thankfulness. "Is anyone among you sick? Let him pray. Is anyone cheerful? Let him sing praise." Because it is the Spirit who sovereignly shapes the Church in the highs and the lows; he is sovereign to bring us face to face with our shortcoming and also the face of Jesus, who is true humility and sincerity.

Friday, December 2, 2011

Probability, motion, and faith

This world offers no stability. We are governed by the reality of probability, tension, and faith. Nothing is sure, nothing is sound. We drive to work and school knowing that nothing guarantees the safety of our commute. We are perpetually out on a limb, so to speak. In every motion, decision, advance, commitment, investment, we are governed by faith, by trust, by counting on something outside of ourselves. Metaphysics is drama. Watching musicians and actors perform puts us on the edge of our seats; there is always great potential for failure and disappointment, but this is precisely what excites us; it is the thrill of motion and relationship. Indeed, it is the thrill of this universe. And as we dramatize this tension we testify and bear witness to a Triune God who is both tension and faithfulness. The eternal rest of God is motion, and the torment and agony of hell is stagnancy.

Presuppositions about Nature in Edwards and the Transcendentalists

One of the most interesting subjects this semester has been our discussion on the transcendentalists in American Literature with Dr. Shaak. What made an impression on me was the similarities and contrasts between the transcendentalists and the Puritans. Transcendentalists assured their readers that human beings are best off trusting their own intuition: "Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string" (from Emerson's "Nature"). And yet both groups hold to a fundamental presupposition that life, nature, history, have inherit meaning within them. For anyone interested, I wrote a paper on the topic comparing Edwards and Emerson particularly. Herewith.


Presuppositions about Nature in Edwards and the Transcendentalists

Jonathan Edwards was convinced of his wickedness, expressing in his “Personal Narrative” that its appearance was “an abyss, infinitely deeper than hell” (“Personal Narrative” 395). He believed in the Puritan understanding of total depravity and was determined to look away from self to Christ. In contrast, Ralph Waldo Emerson’s essay “Self-reliance” has played a key role in shaping the thought of many transcendentalists who have followed in his footsteps such as Henry David Thoreau and Walt Whitman. These two perspectives represent opposite ends of the spectrum in regards to personal identity. Robert Milder, in his essay “From Emerson to Edwards,” refers to the distance from “quasi-omnipotence to a Calvinist sense of dependence and limitation” (Milder 100) to illustrate the difference between these two views.

However, both Edwards and the transcendentalists rejected the notion that life was arbitrary and random; both assumed a metaphysical order rich with meaning. Observing Edward’s notes in “Images of Divine Things” and his various other typological writings in comparison with Emerson’s “Nature” as well as other transcendentalist writings will reveal these similarities. In spite of their often drastically different conclusions, Edwards and the transcendentalists operated with nearly an identical presupposition regarding inherit meaning and spiritual significance in metaphysics, that is, the entire natural world.

Towards the end of his life, Edwards’ planned to write a work on “the Harmony of the Old and New Testaments,” which he never finished. However, many of his personal notes on the subject were left behind. Understanding his method of linking OT types to a universal meaning and ultimately to Christ is the key to grasping his view on the meaning of the natural world and history. His note in “Miscellanies” on types offers a summary: “Very much of the wisdom of God in the creation appears in his so ordering things natural, that they lively represent things divine and spiritual, [such as] sun, fountain, vine” (“Miscellanies” 284) Here Edwards is intentionally using examples that the Bible has used to represent Christ. For Edwards, the OT witness did not simply use historically constrained images that the NT authors then applied to Christ without warrant, but rather he saw these images as eternally representative of Christ, and therefore felt entitled to the same freedom that the NT authors did as he applied the imagery to Christ.

Edwards’ typological methods were not restricted to the OT; this method obviously implied a universal truth regarding the fundamental nature of things both inside and outside the textual world of the Bible. Edwards “believed that the various departments of learning were mutually supportive, and it never occurred to him that when unified by the theological intellect, they would fail to confirm biblical verities” (Cherry 263). In other words, Edwards saw no need for a forceful application of doctrine to real life; in his view doctrine and real life were absolutely consistent. He proceeds smoothly from biblical images to real life: “much of the wisdom of God in his providence, in that the state of mankind is so ordered, that there are innumerable things in human affairs that are lively pictures of the things of the gospel, such as shield, tower, and marriage, family[1]” (“Miscellanies” 284). In his “Personal Narrative” he describes an increase in sensitivity towards divine things as he grew in his knowledge of Scripture, doctrine, and God: “There seemed to be, as it were, a calm, sweet cast, or appearance of divine glory, in almost every thing” (“Personal Narrative” 389).

Edwards made the spiritual interpretation of nature a regular discipline. His work “Images of Divine Things” is a collection of 212 notes in which he interprets various events in life, some of which are intertwined with biblical imagery such as marriage being representative of Christ and the church, others being entirely his own interpretation of the real world: “When we first get up in the morning, we rake open and kindle up the fire. So Christians, when they awake out of a spiritual sleep, re-enkindle their graces” (“Images of Divine Things” 99).[2] The typological illustrations of Christ were fitting in view of “man’s natural delight in the imitative arts” (“Types of Messiah” 191).

There is much parallel to Edwards in Emerson’s section on “Language” in his essay “Nature”: “The use of natural history is to give us aid in supernatural history” (“Nature” 1118). Emerson sees a great significance in details, namely, that nothing is mere detail, nothing is mere chance, and that “it is easily seen that there is nothing lucky or capricious in these analogies but that they are constant, and pervade nature” (“Nature” 1119). In great similarity to Edwards, Emerson viewed the nature of the way things work - the rules which govern nature - to “have a much more extensive and universal sense when applied to human life than when confined to technical use” (“Nature” 1121). Both Edwards and Emerson would denounce those who view life as a collection of arbitrary, random events that humanity must begrudgingly deal with: working, sleeping, sitting in traffic, brushing teeth, showering, studying, etc. Rather, they would both agree that “Space, time, society, labor, climate, food, locomotion, the animals, the mechanical forces, give us sincerest lessons, day by day, whose meaning is unlimited” (“Nature” 1122).

Notice the similarity between Edwards and Emerson as they both discuss the meaningfulness of rivers; Edwards says that as rivers “empty vast quantities of water every day and yet there is never the less to come,” so is the “goodness of God”; the reason rivers exist is because of the goodness of God (“Images of Divine Things” 54). [3] Emerson asks, “Who looks upon a river in a meditative hour, and is not reminded of the flux of all things” (“Nature” 1118)? Although they find different conclusions, both operate with precisely the same notion of significance and inherit meaning.

Thoreau, in his book “Walden,” describes men who “are so occupied with the factitious cares and superfluously coarse labors of life that its finer fruits cannot be plucked by them” (“Walden” 1874). And clearly Walt Whitman’s poem “Song of Myself” teaches the reader to find and savor meaning in “the blab of the pave, tires of carts, sluff of boot-soles, talk of the promenaders” (Song of Myself 2215) and a plethora of other perhaps overlooked scenarios in everyday life. This pattern of listing everyday events and themes of nature is quite similar to Edwards’ method of gathering notes in “Images of Divine Things.” Edwards, Whitman, and Thoreau demand that human beings observe those things that might became mundane in routine and reconsider their meaning. It is not difficult to imagine Edwards applauding the transcendentalists were he not aware of the self-reliant backbone supporting their work. As Conrad Cherry points out, Edwards “sought to live in the typical or literal meaning in such a way that he was carried to its antitypical or symbolic meaning” (Cherry 266) Both Edwards and the transcendentalists were not content to push through the routine of life without examining its deeper, spiritual meaning.

However, Edwards would be appalled at Emerson’s conclusion that “no man touches these divine natures, without becoming, in some degree, himself divine” (“Nature” 1130) and that “the use of the outer creation is to give us language for the beings and changes of the inward creation” (“Nature” 1118). For Edwards, the meaning, or the end for which God created the world, was “So that the whole is of God, and in God, and to God, and God is the beginning, middle and end of this affair. (“The End for Which God Created the World” 255)” Edwards “believed that creation’s symbolic structure was grounded in history’s central symbol, the Christ” (Cherry 270).

While Edwards and the transcendentalists have drastically different motivations and conclusions, both presuppose nature to have inherit meaning and significance; both seek to savor this meaning and to not become lost in a mindless routine, to not be “so occupied with the factitious cares and superfluously coarse labors of life that its finer fruits cannot be plucked,” (“Walden 1874) as Thoreau puts it.

Works Cited

Cherry, Conrad. "Symbols of Spiritual Truth." Interpretation 39.3 (1985): 263-271. Print.

Edwards, Jonathan. The "miscellanies": entry nos. a-z, aa-zz, 1-500. New Haven: Yale

University Press, 1994. Print.

Edwards, Jonathan. Typological writings. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993. Print.

Emerson, Ralph Waldo. "Nature." The Norton anthology of American literature. 7th ed. New

York: W. W. Norton & Co., 2007. 1110-1138. Print.

Emerson, Ralph Waldo. "Self-reliance." The Norton anthology of American literature. 7th ed.

New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 2007. 1163-1180. Print.

Milder, Robert. "From Emerson to Edwards." New England Quarterly (2007): 96-133. Print.

Thoreau, Henry David. "Waldo” The Norton anthology of American literature. 7th ed. New

York: W. W. Norton & Co., 2007. 1872-1914. Print.

Whitman, Walt. "Song of Myself." The Norton anthology of American literature. 7th ed. New

York: W. W. Norton & Co., 2007. 2210-2254. Print.



[1] Miscellanies #119: Types.

[2] Images of Divine Things #137

[3] Images of Divine Things #15

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Categories and Beauty

We look at the world through the blurry lens of categorization. When we observe a building we do not examine every window as it is; instead, we give the building the property of having a good number of windows. In literature, words are buildings; they are skyscrapers, in fact. We may see the phrase "everlasting life" in the Epic of Gilgamesh, but we neatly categorize it without looking at the details provided in the text. We must dig deeper, observing every window, the color of the paint, the doors, the material, in order to acquire a deeper knowledge of the building (phrase) "everlasting life" in the Epic of Gilgamesh.

But here a problem arises. For although we have successfully broken down the category of “building,” for instance, now we must deal with the categories of “window,” "red," “door,” “wood,” etc. And once we have freed ourselves of our presuppositions regarding these categories we must once again categorize “glass,” “chemicals,” “color,” etc. When you look up "heaven" in a dictionary, you will not find heaven; rather, you will find other words, which point to even more words. So the categories - the skyscrapers, the words - are lost in an infinite chain of signs pointing to other signs, and never arrive at actual reality and truth.

So how do we know truth?

I will make a suggestion.

The above demonstration of categorization only deals with cognitive knowledge rather than relational knowledge. The above demonstration proves that if we are left to sheer cognitive ability one could never really know what beauty actually is. But does this mean beauty is then lost? Does this mean - in regards to beauty - there is no difference between genocide and justice? After all, genocide and justice are words, which similarly get lost in an infinite system of categorization.

Here is my suggestion: whereas cognitive knowledge alone leaves us doomed to an infinite chain of signs, relational knowledge provides a standard for actual reality and actual truth. As an example, a husband's knowledge of beauty is not lost in the infinite maze of categorization and culture; rather, it is very tangible as he knows his wife and loves her. All knowledge proceeds from relationship. The only standard for sound epistemology then is the Triune relational God of the Christian religion from whom knowledge proceeds.